Module 2 Blog Topic 1

After reading the blog posts by Bill Kerr and Bill Kapp I gained a new perspective on the use of various learning theories.

I definitely believe that the –isms: constructivism, behaviorism, cognitivism, and more recently connectivism are useful guides on what to think and what to do. The –isms are necessary. Each learning theory offers something useful. They provide valuable insights into human learning. The concept of taking an idea from each school of thought almost seems genius. Using ideas from various learning theories is essentially the essence of a good educational design. We need the integration of all the –isms. Taking bits and pieces from each theory and using them collectively will only benefit us.

It would be simplistic to assume that one learning theory alone has the potential to be used across the board for all. All of the learning theories have a place in the learning process and using ideas from them makes sense. None of our students learn exactly alike, we all leaner differently that is why the concept of using ideas from various learning theories makes sense. Learning is multi-facetted and it is not possible for one learning theory, one school of thought to do it all. We can take the best ideas and concepts from various leaning theories and use them to create an effective educational experience for our learners.

I believe that Kerr (2007) said it best, “learning theories are indispensible to the curriculum reform effort.”

References

Kerr, B (2007). _isms as filter, not blinker (Web Blog Post). Retrieved from http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html.

Kapp, K (2007). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought (Web Blog Post). Retrieved from http://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/.