New Technologies
Clickers were introduced as a pilot program they
were distributed to teachers chosen by their principals to be technology
ambassadors. The devices allowed students and teachers to instantly receive feedback
during lessons or tests. Each student was given a clicker; the device was
numbered, allowing teachers to identify each student’s answer. This technology
was to engage students and encourage them to participate as opposed to teachers
calling on just the students with their hands raised.
I quickly discovered that some teachers found the
change in teaching style daunting, and as a result I was met with some
resistance. Their attitudes about this new technology were far from positive.
One behavioral characteristic that some of the teachers developed was they
asked for more and more information about the new technology but, no matter how
much information I provided the, they insisted that they needed more.
Resistance is an emotional response; it is a very
natural reaction to change associated with the implementation of new
technology. I thought that this new technology was so great I failed to realize
that resistance might occur. Now that I look back on it I realize that the
realization that resistance may occur was critical, in order for me to
successfully manage the resistance so that the energy that the teachers were
using on resisting could have been used to support the implementation of this
new technology rather than cripple it.
If I had used Keller’s ARCS Model I could have
promoted and sustained motivation in this technology using attention,
relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. I could have used inquiry arousal to
stimulate curiosity by posing challenging questions or problems that could be
solved using this technology. I could have established the relevance of this
technology to increase motivation. I could have elaborated further on the
present worth of the technology and the future usefulness of it. Confidence
could have been further established by expressing my confidence in the
technology. I could have presented evidence of the success of the technology.
This model could have changed the motivation of the teachers and encouraged
success.
References
Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd
ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Pam, I can't tell you how many times I have been totally excited about a new technology and receive a tepid at best response from teachers. Through a painful process I have learned which other staff I can talk to technology about without having to worry about resistance. I talk to those people first when I am really excited so I have time to get it under control before I talk to the ones who typically resist. -- Carol
ReplyDelete